Showing posts with label Regulations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regulations. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2018

Robocallers Use Out-of-State Loopholes to Evade Strict California Regulations



Robocalls, even from a company or political platform that you feel connected to, can be annoying at the best of times. Recently, there was a controversial legal battle centering around freedom of speech, the conclusion of which was that the state of Montana technically has the legal right to pass a law banning robocalls, even those of a political nature. At the very least, this decision could help Montanans to crack down and have specific rules regarding such calls, in an attempt to reduce the number, if not do away with them altogether. Interestingly enough, discovers David Lazarus in his L.A. Times article, California has some pretty strict laws regarding robocallers. It just so happens that nobody follows them.

Politicians in California have found loopholes to get around the laws regarding robocallers. According to the California Public Utilities Code, every robocall within California is required to begin with a live person and the name, phone number, and address of the organization making the call. Then, the live operator has to ask permission and get consent before playing the pre-recorded message. Only if every single one of those criteria is met is the robocall legally permissible. Of course, because most people are so accustomed to illegal robocalls, a call meeting those criteria tends to resemble telemarketing more than robocalling, which, of course, has its own set of negative responses.

Californian homes get constant robocalls from the beginning of election season all the way to election day. The way that most get away with the robocalls without technically breaking state law is by designing the calls to originate outside of the state. If the robocall is coming from a computer server in another state, technically it doesn't require a live operator or affirmative consent or really any other regulations before playing the message. Of course, even though this strategy avoids breaking state laws, it may be breaking federal laws, although that doesn't stop much. According to federal law, robocallers can't call cell phones (again, something that still happens all too often), but the federal policy has no restriction on robocalls to landlines. Even though many people have given up their landlines over the years, there are still several million throughout the country that can be targeted.

As you can see, there are restrictions on when and how a political representative can place robocalls. However, those regulations can be easily side-stepped. There is a potential solution, though. Because the callers can avoid state regulations by making the calls from another state, this can be prevented by passing a regulation that prohibits political robocalls from being placed out of state. If the political groups have to place their calls from in state, they will be forced to follow the state regulations, which would reduce annoyance and frustration among many recipients. Of course, this would severely limit the scope of a political group's reach, but at least they would be able to better target voters interested in their specific platform.

***************************************************************************************************
Find out more about us at www.sepulvedaescrow.net. Any Questions? Contact our Escrow Expert! Sepulveda Escrow Corporation (818) 838-1831. Follow our company on FacebookTwitterLinkedIn, and Google+.
**************************************************************************************************

Friday, August 26, 2016

Proposed Bill to Help Widowed Spouses Renegotiate Mortgage Rates



Under current practice in California, if a widowed spouse is an owner of their home, but wasn't on the mortgage note at the time of their husband or wife's passing, obtaining a loan modification can be extremely difficult. Often, when the overall household income goes down due to a spouse's death, the surviving spouse will have trouble coming up with the monthly payment on a mortgage that was determined earlier on based on two salaries instead of just the one. Additionally, laws don't protect widows and widowers from being foreclosed upon while trying to get their bearings. Fortunately, as described by Andrew Khouri in his L.A. Times article, a few Senators have proposed a bill to try to help people stuck in that kind of predicament.

A common practice by banks in these situations is called "dual tracking." Dual tracking simply means that a bank is pursuing a foreclosure while also negotiating a modified mortgage with the client at the same time. Through that method, banks are able to cover all of their bases and make sure that they don't get stuck in an endless cycle of paperwork. Unfortunately, that leaves widowed homeowners trapped. While loan servicers will generally accept payments from the surviving spouse, they rarely can get through all the red tape around proving ownership before the foreclosure has completed. So, in many of these situations, unless the surviving spouse has some way of making up the difference in monthly loan payment for long enough to hold off a foreclosure, they end up losing their home due to no real fault of their own.

One of the benefits to homeowners of the new bill being proposed is that dual tracking will be banned. In other words, foreclosure proceedings are put on hold while all of the required documentation is taken care of. Only once the lender and borrower have finished negotiating the loan modification can any necessary foreclosure continue. This provision in the bill can hold off foreclosure for a limited amount of time, but it only applies to major financial institutions. Smaller banks are exempt from the regulations, which makes sense since smaller lenders are less able to afford to grant extensions on their loans.

The bill, Senate Bill 1150, has been amended a few times and has since been passed by the Senate and Assembly. One important amendment added to the bill was a three-year sunset provision, which means that the bill will have to be formally renewed every three years or it will be thrown out. Legislators hope that the new laws will help to fix the system that punishes widowed homeowners for factors beyond their control. Since the bill has already been passed, all that is left is for the governor to sign it into law. Then, we shall see how much the system really changes.

***************************************************************************************************
Find out more about us at www.sepulvedaescrow.net. Any Questions? Contact our Escrow Expert! Sepulveda Escrow Corporation (818) 838-1831. Follow our company on FacebookTwitterLinkedIn, and Google+.
***************************************************************************************************